Benchmark Document in Biosafety of GM Crops in Asia

The benchmark document prepared by Dr. Varma in cooperation with the focal points, was validated during the second focal points meeting. The document was then revised based on the suggestions and comments of the focal points.

The document indicates that the participating countries vary greatly in their capacities related to GMO biosafety. It shows that most of the countries require considerable efforts to build up capacity for regulating GMOs. For successful regulation it is imperative to build capacity for R and D related to GMOs. Some countries in the region have advanced in this direction and can help the other participating countries in quickly developing capacity to harmonize and implement biosafety regulations for the safe use of modern biotechnology.

Biotechnology has been recognized as an important tool for improving agricultural production in a suitable and environmentally friendly manner, and for fighting hunger and malnutrition. The new technology is of great relevance for the countries participating in the current program since a large proportion of the population in these countries is directly dependent on agriculture. However, for harnessing full potential of biotechnology (particularly GMOs), it is essential to strengthen capacities in relation to human resources, research and technology development, regulatory measures, policies and transparent transfer of technologies. The document outlines approaches to build capacity in participating countries in the context of Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The key areas include:

  1. Human resources (in situ and ex situ training, group training, national/regional workshops and updating of training manual).
  2. Regulatory mechanisms (development of biosafety guidelines, putting in place various acts on biosafety, enhancement of inter-country coordination, establishment of National Biosafety Committee and Institutional Biosafety Committee, and harmonization of regulations in the region).
  3. Policies and programs (enhance professionalism in implementing agencies, develop policies for undertaking risk assessment and risk management, raise institutional awareness, and harmonize biosafety program and technology transfer).
  4. Financial requirements (provide adequate funding and identify sources of funds).
  5. Regional collaboration (capacity building, workshops, training, strengthening Asia BioNet, collaborative research, harmonization of risk assessment/management techniques, strengthening of quarantine systems, etc).
  6. Development of time frame for all key areas.

The document also includes other areas such as: financial status of biotechnology and biosafety programs; sustainability of the initiative, environmental issues, weediness (unintentional transboundary management through gene flow or intentional farmers exchange across the borders), strengthening of policy advocacy, harmonization with UNEP-GEF and ASEAN project on biosafety, farmers awareness, categorization of GMOs, listing of biosafety laboratories, biosecurity.


Download (PDF)